The aspect of "Public Transport and Infrastructure" in sustainable housing development focuses on the strategic location of residential developments in proximity to public transport and essential services. This approach is aimed at reducing residents' reliance on private cars and promoting more sustainable modes of transport while ensuring easy access to necessary amenities.
Developers may, however, claim that a housing development is sustainable even though it lacks convenient access to essential services and public transport, leading to increased car journeys and pollution in the area. This may be seen as greenwashing - a deceptive marketing practice that exaggerates or misrepresents a project's sustainability credentials. In such circumstances, objections to the development can be made on the following grounds:
Increased Carbon Emissions:
When residents have to rely heavily on private cars to access schools, shops, and other essential services located at a distance, it leads to an increase in car journeys. This results in higher carbon emissions and air pollution, undermining the development's claim of being sustainable. Sustainable development should prioritise reducing the carbon footprint, not exacerbating it.
Traffic Congestion:
An increase in car journeys can lead to traffic congestion in the area. This not only frustrates residents but also wastes time and energy, contributing to inefficiency and reduced overall quality of life.
Health Impacts:
Increased air pollution from additional car journeys can have detrimental health effects on residents. Poor air quality is linked to respiratory issues, cardiovascular problems, and other health concerns, which contradicts the goal of creating a healthy and sustainable living environment.
Social Isolation:
In a development where residents must rely on cars to access essential services, there can be a lack of opportunities for social interaction and community building. This can lead to social isolation, as people spend more time in their cars and less time engaging with their neighbours.
Inequity:
The development may inadvertently create inequity, as not everyone may have access to a car or the means to maintain one. Those without cars, including lower-income residents, may face challenges in accessing essential services, exacerbating social and economic disparities.
Lost Opportunities for Active Transportation:
The lack of proximity to schools, shops, and public transport can discourage walking and cycling, contributing to a sedentary lifestyle. Encouraging active transportation is an important component of sustainable development, as it promotes physical health and reduces pollution.
In summary, while a housing development may claim to be sustainable for various reasons, its sustainability should be assessed holistically, taking into account its impact on transportation patterns, pollution, health, and social wellbeing. A development that increases car journeys to access essential services may fall short of the sustainability goals it purports to achieve, and these concerns should be given due consideration in the decision-making process.
Comments