top of page
Writer's pictureHanham Green Belt

What to Expect When Developers Appeal a Local Council’s Decision to Refuse Planning Permission for a Development on Green Belt Land




When a firm of developers appeals a local council’s decision to refuse an outline planning application, particularly for building on Green Belt land, the process can be complex and drawn out. Green Belt land in England is subject to strict regulations intended to protect open spaces from urban sprawl, making such appeals highly scrutinized. If you're affected by or interested in a development appeal like this, here’s what to expect:


1. Understanding the Basis of the Appeal


The developer’s appeal will likely focus on challenging the council’s refusal based on the material planning considerations cited in the rejection. Councils typically refuse development on Green Belt land for reasons such as:


  • Harm to the environment or landscape: Green Belt policies are intended to safeguard countryside from encroachment and preserve the character of rural areas.


  • Conflicts with local planning policy: Councils refer to the local development framework, which outlines the vision for future land use and development.


  • Inadequate infrastructure or services: The local authority may argue that the proposed development would strain public services, roads, schools, or health facilities.


Developers might counter these points by presenting evidence that the housing is needed to meet local housing shortages or that exceptional circumstances justify development in the Green Belt.


2. The Appeal Process


When developers lodge an appeal, the matter is escalated from the local planning authority (the council) to the Planning Inspectorate, a government body that handles appeals.


Here’s a typical outline of what happens next:


  • Submission of the Appeal: Developers have six months from the council’s refusal to submit an appeal. This includes submitting detailed documents, plans, and a statement of case.


  • Notification to Interested Parties: If you’re a resident near the proposed site or an interested party, you’ll receive notification of the appeal. You can submit comments or objections, typically within a 5-week window.


  • Inspector's Review: A Planning Inspector is assigned to the case and will thoroughly review the planning application, council decision, and any evidence submitted by both sides. They may visit the site as part of their assessment.


3. Different Types of Appeal Hearings


There are three possible types of hearings for planning appeals, and the developer’s choice may influence how public the process is:


  • Written Representations: The simplest and most common type of appeal. Both sides submit their evidence in writing, and the Inspector makes a decision based on the documentation.


  • Informal Hearing: A more interactive process, where a Planning Inspector conducts a hearing with both the council and developers present. It is open to the public and allows for the discussion of key points.


  • Public Inquiry: The most formal and complex process, similar to a court hearing. Lawyers often represent both sides, witnesses may be called, and interested parties (such as local residents or action groups) may have a chance to speak. Public inquiries usually involve more detailed examination of the issues and can last several days or even weeks.


4. Key Considerations During the Appeal


In an appeal involving Green Belt land, the Planning Inspectorate will examine several critical points:


  • Is the development “inappropriate” for Green Belt land? Green Belt policies generally consider residential development inappropriate unless it meets specific exceptions. Developers will need to demonstrate that their proposal fits within those exceptions or argue that the need for housing outweighs the Green Belt protection.


  • Are there “very special circumstances” to justify the Development? Developers often argue that factors such as a lack of alternative sites, housing shortages, or the social and economic benefits of new homes should outweigh the harm caused by developing Green Belt land.


  • Impact on Local Infrastructure: The Planning Inspector will review the development’s potential strain on local infrastructure, such as roads, schools, and healthcare facilities, which can be a strong point in the council’s refusal.


5. Potential Outcomes


After reviewing all the evidence and conducting hearings or inquiries, the Planning Inspector will make a decision. The possible outcomes are:


  • Appeal Dismissed: The Inspector agrees with the local council’s decision, and the refusal to grant planning permission is upheld. The developers cannot proceed with the project.


  • Appeal Allowed: The Inspector overturns the council’s refusal, granting outline planning permission. The developers can then submit detailed plans (called "reserved matters") for the next stage of approval.


  • Conditions Imposed: In some cases, the Inspector may allow the appeal but impose conditions. For example, they might require changes to the layout or scale of the development to minimize its environmental impact or ensure infrastructure improvements are in place before construction begins.


6. Impacts on the Local Community


Residents and local stakeholders should be aware of how the appeal process might affect them. If the appeal is allowed, it could have significant implications for the local area:


  • Increased traffic and pressure on public services: New housing often leads to more cars on the road and greater demand on local schools, doctors’ surgeries, and other facilities.


  • Environmental changes: Green Belt developments may alter the landscape, reduce open space, and affect local wildlife habitats.


  • Property value concerns: Some residents worry about the impact of new housing on property values, though this can vary depending on local market conditions.


7. Community Involvement


Residents and interest groups can play an important role during the appeal process. Submitting objections, supporting the council’s decision, or appearing at public inquiries can help ensure that the community's concerns are considered. Local residents may highlight issues such as the loss of green space, harm to the rural character, or insufficient infrastructure.


Conclusion


The appeal process for a planning application refusal, especially one involving Green Belt land, can be a lengthy and complex affair. If you’re a resident or stakeholder, it’s important to stay informed, engage in the process, and be prepared for the possibility that the outcome could go either way. Understanding the process can help manage expectations and ensure that all voices are heard in what is often a highly contested decision.


Ultimately, these appeals highlight the delicate balance between development needs and environmental protection, with far-reaching implications for local communities and the landscape of England’s Green Belt.

50 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page